Robotic Arm

P1 Humanoid Arm - Technical Infographic

P1 Humanoid Arm: Technical Engineering Brief

Validated Design: Actuator Sizing, Reliability, and Kinematic Structure

Core Mechanical Performance Targets

Max Payload
5.0 kg

At full 900mm extension

Total Reach
900 mm

Shoulder to Gripper Tip

Kinematic Complexity
9 DOF

3 Shoulder, 3 Elbow, 2 Wrist, 1 Gripper

Joint Life
1M+ Cycles

Design Basis (Endurance Testing)

Kinematic Architecture & Modular Breakdown

The arm is modularized into four main assemblies, each housing actuators and sensors to achieve the total 9 Degrees of Freedom. This structure is critical for simplified manufacturing and repair.

A10: Shoulder
3 DOF (Yaw, Roll, Pitch)
High-Torque Joint. Uses 80mm Frameless BLDC.
A20: Elbow
3 DOF (Yaw, Pitch, Roll)
Mid-Torque Joint. Uses 60mm Frameless BLDC.
A30: Wrist
2 DOF (Pitch, Yaw)
Low-profile, high-speed smart servos.
A40: Gripper
1 DOF (Parallel Jaw)
Smart servo with force-sensing pads.

Component Cost Segmentation

The majority of the $\$2,045$ unit cost is concentrated in high-precision, low-backlash actuation components. This intentional expenditure ensures the joint life and high payload capacity requirements are met.

  • Precision Gearing (Harmonic Drives)
  • Frameless Motors (Shoulder/Elbow)
  • Servos (Wrist/Gripper)
  • Structural/Electronics

Actuator Sizing and Safety Factor Validation

The required continuous torque to hold the $5.0\text{ kg}$ payload at $900\text{ mm}$ reach is $\mathbf{0.562\text{ Nm}}$ at the motor shaft. The revised $\mathbf{1.0\text{ Nm}}$ continuous motor ensures a robust $\mathbf{1.78\times}$ safety margin.

Shoulder Torque Demand vs. Reach

The blue curve shows the required torque to hold a 5kg payload (static load) as a function of arm extension. The green dashed line indicates the continuous capacity of the motor (C11-01) mapped back to the joint, confirming significant operational headroom.

Actuator Safety Margin Audit

Comparison of loads vs. motor ratings. The **Continuous Rated** torque (1.0 Nm) provides $1.78\times$ the required holding torque (0.562 Nm), exceeding the $1.5\times$ requirement. Peak margin is $2.79\times$.

Risk Reduction: FMEA & DfR Actions

The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) highlighted "Cable Chafe" and "Fastener Loosening" as critical risks with high initial Risk Priority Numbers (RPN > 100). The implementation of Design for Reliability (DfR) actions, such as reinforced cable conduit and standardized thread-locking procedures, drastically reduced these risks.

Average RPN Reduction
40.4%
Across Top 3 Critical Failure Modes

Design Verification Testing (DVT) Roadmap

The DVT plan is segmented into four phases to ensure complete verification against all mechanical and environmental specifications before mass production approval.

Phase 1: Environmental

Verify material stability and component function across operational extremes.

  • Thermal Cycle: -40°C to 85°C
  • Humidity: 95% RH for 96 Hrs

Phase 2: Shock & Vibration

Validate fastener and connector integrity under typical transportation and operational forces.

  • Shock: 30g, 11ms Half-Sine
  • Vibration: 0.04 g²/Hz Random

Phase 3: Endurance Cycling

Simulate lifetime operation to confirm the 1M cycle target and assess wear on gears/bearings.

  • Target: 30,000 Cycles (Accelerated)
  • Load: 5.0 kg Full Payload

Phase 4: Functional Audit

Final performance metrics measured on the tested units.

  • Hysteresis: $\le 5$ arcmin
  • Repeatability: $\le 0.1\text{ mm}$

P1 Humanoid Arm: Technical Infographic | Data derived from BOM_Atlas, ATLAS_FMEA, and Verification Reports.

Comments